Having grown up in the home of a preschool teacher who has always taught in a play-centered classroom, I’ve witnessed the importance of play in the physical, social, emotional, and cognitive development of a young person. Mom and I speak frequently about our concern for the lack of play at all levels of education. Kenneth Ginsburg, in an article for Pediatrics, reinforces that highly-scheduled children (which so many of our students are!) have had less time for free, creative play and therefore have built fewer coping mechanisms for managing the effects of pressure and stress. Of course, I can not wholly mitigate this; but I can help students harness (thanks Amber!) their creative potential to not only foster cognitive growth but also social-emotional well-being. I can help them use play as a means for creation.
Compelled to prioritize play as a creative force, inspired by Angela Stockman’s Make Writing, driven to help students find intuitive ways to structure their argument research writing, I use this lesson to help students move beyond the perceived rigidity of the research paper.
Objectives:
- Understand the roles of tools and of play in the act of creating;
- Discover a possible structure for the argument research paper that serves both purpose and audience;
- Inspire confidence in students’ own decision-making skills as writers.
Lesson:
Step 1: For my AP Language and Composition students, many of whom are used to the highly analytical, “academic” environment (indeed, the one I–along with others–foster), I begin by positioning the learning opportunity. I show them pictures of my own children: in one, they play with cardboard boxes, making their own spaceships, dressed in costume for the occasion; in the other, swirling words and designs into shaving cream, using fingers and forks and Duplos. This is critical! These pictures evoke memories of their own childhood, priming my students’ imaginations. Then I share words from Kenneth Ginsburg: “play helps children develop new competencies that lead to enhanced confidence and the resiliency they will need to face future challenges. …When play is allowed to be child driven, children practice decision-making skills, move at their own pace, discover their own areas of interest, and ultimately engage fully in the passions they wish to pursue.”
Step 2: Purpose articulated, I give the a tour of the “Play Stations”:
-
- Imagineering: Disney Imagineers cut out a collection of images they find interesting and then they start to arrange them to see if they can blend ideas. At this station, students find old books and magazines, paper, scissors, and glue so they can imagine away.
- LEGOS and Duplos: At this station, students find these toys for building; considering the size, shape, and color of the LEGOS/Duplos, students experiment with the structure of their piece.
- Pipe Cleaners and Beads: At this station, students are encouraged to consider the size, shape, and color of the beads and to talk through their ideas as they string the beads. When they finish, they look for patterns.
- Comic Book Templates, Receipt Roll Paper, and Craft Paper: At this station, students use the comic book templates provided to craft the “story” of their argument. They may also choose some receipt roll paper to work with the “story” in more linear ways or craft roll paper to make “cave drawings” or other illustrations of their ideas.
- Painting: At this station, students use watercolor paints or paint pens along with paper plates (this offers a different constraint) or paper to paint their arguments.
- Play dough: At this station, students use play dough (homemade is the best) to mold and shape their argument. Sometimes I encourage multiple buildings since the joy of play dough is how easy it is to build, destroy, re-build.
Step 3: Before freeing my students to play, I ask them to consider this question: “What can you build that will meet the needs of your audience and purpose?”. I also direct them to review their work plan, their issue, claim, and a list of topics they’ll address in their papers.
Step 4: Play. “Confer” (I ask students to tell me about what they are making. I offer observations about their creations. I exclaim over the cool things they invent.).
Step 5: Reflect. On post-its, students describe what they made, what they discovered, and what they may do as a result.
Follow-Up:
Following this lesson, I share other ways to arrange or format an argument paper, including Persuasive, Rogerian, Pro Con, Problem Solution, Problem-Cause-Solution, Top 5, Monroe’s Motivated Sequence, and others. When my students ask if it’s okay if they use the structure they invented or if it’s okay to combine what they invented with one of these structures or even if they can combine these new structures, I see the value of play. I see my students combining, adapting, modifying, synthesizing, and harnessing their own potential to discover–for themselves!–how to shape their writing.
Kristin Jeschke helps her students–in AP Language and Composition and College Prep English at Waukee High School–harness their intuition through play. She doesn’t even mind the chaos and inevitable mess that follows (as long as it leads to creation). She thanks her parents for free time to play in the dirt and the sand. Follow her on Twitter @kajeschke.
Tagged: creativity, mini-lesson, Mini-lesson: Writing
I love this idea. Could you clarify exactly what they are “building” at these stations? For instance, you talk about “painting their argument.” What does that mean exactly? Do they have a specific assignment they are working on? Or are they illustrating the structure of an argument in general? Thanks!
LikeLike
Dear Karen:
My AP Language and Composition students were working on argument research papers. At this point, students had determined the issue and the audience, wrote from what they knew from observation, knowledge, and experience, determined what research to cull, and determined (work plan) reasons, counters, needs and values and claim. It was time to think of purposeful arrangement for audience. The instructions remained rather loose so that they could work from intuition—from their own perceptions of what would work for their audience. They had to think of their audience and what they wanted the audience to do, think, or feel as a result of the argument. Those that painted—as I think I’ve observed in the past—tended to paint more of the effect they intended to have. Sometimes what they paint becomes an analogy they can use; sometimes they paint shapes of sections that help them think about relationships. With LEGOs, it’s what do you think the shape of the paper should be? Again, sometimes it’s an analogy. Sometimes it’s how the pieces fit as they name or label them. I encourage talk through this process, too, as this is a process of discovery. And, I almost always follow up with a ML about formalized structures.
Hope this helps.
Sometimes a loose question is all they need: if your argument was a painting, what would it look like? What Lego pieces would represent each part of your argument?
LikeLike